AI models that predict diabetes can produce biased results for certain groups of patients, and several methods have been developed to reduce this. This study compared three of these methods on the same data, a widely used dataset of 768 women aged 21 and over, assessing fairness across age groups.
Each method had different strengths. The first relied on simple, transparent decision rules, making its predictions easy to interpret, but it had no specific mechanism to ensure fairness. The second was designed to prevent the model from basing its predictions on age, and achieved perfect results on the fairness measures used while keeping accuracy at an acceptable level. The third corrected the imbalance between patients with and without diabetes in the data, which gave the highest overall accuracy but did not ensure fairness.
The authors conclude that none of the methods achieves the right balance between accuracy, fairness and interpretability on its own, and propose combining several strategies to reduce bias in AI-based diabetes diagnosis.
Learn more about this study here: https://doi.org/10.54554/jtec.2025.17.03.004
Reference:
Mohd Hamdan, M.D.H., Ab Jabal, M.F., Abdul Rahman, S., & Kapi, A.Y. (2025). Fairness And Bias Mitigation in AI Models for Diabetes Diagnosis: A Comparative Evaluation of Algorithmic Approaches. Journal of Telecommunication, Electronic and Computer Engineering, 17(3), 27–34.